Biodefense funding: changes from president's budget to congressional appropriations.

نویسندگان

  • Tara Kirk Sell
  • Kate Gilles
  • Crystal Franco
چکیده

S ince 2004, the Center for Biosecurity has tracked and published a series of articles detailing funding for civilian biodefense programs throughout the federal government. Each year, when the President publishes a budget for the federal agencies, the biodefense funding analysis is updated with new appropriations amounts and new programs. Estimated funding for the previous fiscal year is replaced with actual funding amounts; proposed budget amounts for the current fiscal year are replaced with current estimates based on congressional appropriations; and the newly proposed presidential budget for the next fiscal year is added. The annual biodefense funding analysis focuses primarily on the presidential budget for the next fiscal year because it provides an indication of potential funding levels for biodefense programs. However, in reality, the President’s budget is only a guideline indicating the administration’s priorities. Congressional funding does not automatically follow the President’s budget request. In fact, Congress rarely funds programs at exactly the same level requested by the President. Given the complicated federal budget and appropriations process, we decided to further characterize the change in select biodefense program funding levels from the President’s budgets to congressional appropriations each year. For many programs these changes are significant. In some cases Congress has reduced program funding in comparison to the President’s budget, while in other cases Congress has restored funding to programs that were proposed to be reduced or eliminated by the President. This article offers an analysis of how funding amounts proposed in the presidential budget each year differ from actual funds appropriated by Congress for the same fiscal years. The analysis highlights funding level changes in a number of selected civilian biodefense programs.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.

1797 POLICYFORUM F ederal funding for biomedical R&D through the National Institutes of Health has grown from $8.3 billion in FY1984 to $28.7 billion in FY2008 (1, 2). The NIH supports half of all federal nondefense R&D and more than 60% of federally funded research in American universities (3). The agency awards funds to research performers based on " peer review " but the decisions are not in...

متن کامل

Billions for biodefense: federal agency biodefense funding, FY2001-FY2005.

Over the past several years, the United States government has spent substantial resources on preparing the nation against a bioterrorist attack. This article analyzes the civilian biodefense funding by the federal government from fiscal years 2001 through 2005, specifically analyzing the budgets and allocations for biodefense at the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Hom...

متن کامل

Frozen Funding on Firearm Research: “Doing Nothing Is No Longer an Acceptable Solution”

December 2015 saw another Congressional budget standoff and threatened government shutdown. This omnibus bill was particularly important for public health, because – for the first time in years – it contained language that would have reversed a 19-year-old prohibition on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding for research on firearm injury. Unfortunately, 2016’s final Omnibus ...

متن کامل

Winners and Losers: Formula versus Competitive Funding of Agricultural Research

State Agricultural Experiment Stations (SAESs) were established with federal formula funding by the Hatch Act of 1887. In 1955, the Hatch Act was amended and a number of subsequent formula funding programs were consolidated under the USDA Cooperative States Research Service (CSRS), which today is known as the Cooperative Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES). Currently, all of the ...

متن کامل

Entry barriers and medical board funding autonomy

In this paper we develop and test the hypothesis that institutional funding arrangments affect the extent to which public agencies are influenced by special interests. We test this hypothesis using data on state medical boards. In 1989, medical boards in twenty-one states received budget appropriations from their legislatures. The remaining boards operated independent of legislative control, fi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science

دوره 10 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012